PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.66%
Revenue decline while LSCC shows 2.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-5.26%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-7.81%
Gross profit decline while LSCC shows 6.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.24%
Margin decline while LSCC shows 3.56% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-5.98%
R&D reduction while LSCC shows 10.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
43.14%
Other expenses growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.93%
Operating expenses growth less than half of LSCC's 7.86%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-2.46%
Total costs reduction while LSCC shows 2.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.87%
D&A growth above 1.5x LSCC's 8.12%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-6.95%
EBITDA decline while LSCC shows 3.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.32%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-18.60%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
82.14%
Other expenses growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.56%
Tax expense reduction while LSCC shows 170.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.76%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.86%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.86%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.91%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.81%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.