205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.35%
Positive growth while LSCC shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.26%
Cost increase while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.67%
Positive growth while LSCC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.18%
Margin expansion below 50% of LSCC's 6.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.87%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.13%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-3.34%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.69%
Total costs growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.17%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.33%
D&A growth while LSCC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.02%
EBITDA growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.15%
EBITDA margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
19.65%
Operating income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.51%
Operating margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.76%
Other expenses growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.19%
Pre-tax income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.01%
Pre-tax margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.35%
Tax expense growth while LSCC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.94%
Net income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.72%
Net margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.22%
EPS growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.58%
Diluted EPS growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.03%
Share count reduction while LSCC shows 0.63% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.10%
Diluted share reduction while LSCC shows 0.02% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.