205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.02%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 4.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
4.17%
Cost growth less than half of LSCC's 24.62%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
7.03%
Positive growth while LSCC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.95%
Margin expansion while LSCC shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.26%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
Other expenses growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.89%
Operating expenses growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.86%
Total costs growth above 1.5x LSCC's 1.45%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
30.43%
Interest expense growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.75%
D&A growth while LSCC reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.09%
EBITDA growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.89%
EBITDA margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.59%
Operating income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.32%
Operating margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-220.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
9.85%
Pre-tax income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.62%
Pre-tax margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.96%
Tax expense growth less than half of LSCC's 124.96%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
2.86%
Net income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.62%
EPS growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.70%
Diluted EPS growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.61%
Share count reduction while LSCC shows 4.87% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.80%
Diluted share reduction while LSCC shows 0.62% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.