205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.56%
Revenue growth below 50% of LSCC's 6.90%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.33%
Cost growth less than half of LSCC's 5.68%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-0.22%
Gross profit decline while LSCC shows 7.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.77%
Margin decline while LSCC shows 0.53% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.11%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x LSCC's 3.59%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.67%
Other expenses growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.10%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of LSCC's 6.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
2.97%
Total costs growth less than half of LSCC's 6.12%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
8.16%
Interest expense growth less than half of LSCC's 42.20%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
9.17%
D&A growth above 1.5x LSCC's 1.23%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
0.10%
EBITDA growth below 50% of LSCC's 2.80%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.45%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.65%
Operating income decline while LSCC shows 4.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.20%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
52.38%
Other expenses growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.86%
Pre-tax income decline while LSCC shows 2.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.92%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.17%
Net income growth below 50% of LSCC's 4.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.38%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.21%
EPS growth below 50% of LSCC's 6.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.82%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of LSCC's 3.13%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.76%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.75%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.