PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.47%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 3.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
6.93%
Cost growth above 1.5x LSCC's 3.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
1.64%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of LSCC's 3.08%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-1.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.84%
R&D growth less than half of LSCC's 16.55%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.97%
Operating expenses growth less than half of LSCC's 14.64%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
4.66%
Total costs growth less than half of LSCC's 9.57%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
30.88%
Interest expense growth while LSCC reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.76%
D&A growth above 1.5x LSCC's 4.11%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
4.18%
EBITDA growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.69%
EBITDA margin growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.96%
Operating income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
150.00%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x LSCC's 102.00%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
2.88%
Pre-tax income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
17.65%
Tax expense growth while LSCC reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.82%
Net income growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.53%
EPS growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.08%
Diluted EPS growth while LSCC declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.11%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x LSCC's 0.23%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.