205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
20.82%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 10.82%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
-19.07%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 6.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
177.57%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 15.09%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
129.74%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 3.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
166.86%
Operating expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.73%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
332.53%
D&A growth while MCHP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
2457.63%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 144.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2051.37%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 120.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
251.26%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 132.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
190.73%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x MCHP's 128.88%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-385.50%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 29.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-65.91%
Pre-tax income decline while MCHP shows 90.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-71.78%
Pre-tax margin decline while MCHP shows 91.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-164.75%
Tax expense reduction while MCHP shows 120.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-44.77%
Net income decline while MCHP shows 87.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.29%
Net margin decline while MCHP shows 89.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.00%
EPS decline while MCHP shows 70.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MCHP shows 70.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
19.85%
Share count reduction below 50% of MCHP's 0.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
19.85%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MCHP's 0.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.