205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.66%
Revenue growth below 50% of MCHP's 10.82%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.32%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 6.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
11.13%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MCHP's 15.09%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
8.25%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 3.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.27%
Operating expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.57%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
225.00%
D&A growth while MCHP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
32.12%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MCHP's 144.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.70%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 120.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
26.01%
Operating income growth below 50% of MCHP's 132.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.75%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 128.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-450.00%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 29.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
15.98%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MCHP's 90.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.97%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 91.53%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-12.28%
Tax expense reduction while MCHP shows 120.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
30.36%
Net income growth below 50% of MCHP's 87.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
26.98%
Net margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 89.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.00%
EPS growth below 50% of MCHP's 70.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MCHP's 70.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.46%
Share count reduction below 50% of MCHP's 0.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
8.46%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MCHP's 0.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.