205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.86%
Similar revenue growth to MCHP's 10.82%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
13.34%
Cost growth above 1.5x MCHP's 6.26%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
0.99%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MCHP's 15.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.08%
Margin decline while MCHP shows 3.85% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1800.77%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-351.72%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-260.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3225.23%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 144.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2926.88%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 120.17%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3232.57%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 132.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2933.56%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 128.88%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-32004.55%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 29.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.06%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MCHP's 90.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.19%
Pre-tax margin decline while MCHP shows 91.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.00%
Tax expense growth less than half of MCHP's 120.44%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-8.90%
Net income decline while MCHP shows 87.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.08%
Net margin decline while MCHP shows 89.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.50%
EPS decline while MCHP shows 70.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MCHP shows 70.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.38%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.33% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
16.37%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MCHP's 0.33%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.