205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.33%
Revenue growth below 50% of MCHP's 9.54%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.22%
Cost growth less than half of MCHP's 8.33%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-1.92%
Gross profit decline while MCHP shows 10.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.25%
Margin decline while MCHP shows 0.69% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
90.64%
R&D growth above 1.5x MCHP's 11.94%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.03%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MCHP's 12.11%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
9.54%
Similar total costs growth to MCHP's 10.15%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.50%
D&A reduction while MCHP shows 16.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-542.50%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 10.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-541.03%
EBITDA margin decline while MCHP shows 0.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-231.58%
Operating income decline while MCHP shows 7.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-231.14%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-166.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-244.57%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-244.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.25%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-293.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-292.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-274.42%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-274.42%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.10%
Share count increase while MCHP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.51%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.