205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
91.94%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 2.86%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
78.64%
Cost growth above 1.5x MCHP's 48.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
122.82%
Positive growth while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
16.09%
Margin expansion while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
20.71%
R&D growth while MCHP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.93%
Operating expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
52.37%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MCHP's 5.69%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-433.33%
D&A reduction while MCHP shows 4.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
184.29%
EBITDA growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
143.92%
EBITDA margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
188.14%
Operating income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
145.92%
Operating margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
50.00%
Other expenses change of 50.00% while MCHP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
170.72%
Pre-tax income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
136.84%
Pre-tax margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
164.71%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
560.71%
Net income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
340.03%
Net margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
589.13%
EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
589.13%
Diluted EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.32%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 5.40%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
3.74%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MCHP's 5.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.