205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.49%
Revenue decline while MCHP shows 0.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.16%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 5.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
13.22%
Positive growth while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
16.11%
Margin expansion while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.90%
R&D reduction while MCHP shows 6.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.10%
Operating expenses reduction while MCHP shows 21.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-12.74%
Total costs reduction while MCHP shows 10.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.85%
D&A growth above 1.5x MCHP's 6.58%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
173.80%
EBITDA growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
175.68%
EBITDA margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
634.21%
Operating income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
647.86%
Operating margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-55.34%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
283.08%
Pre-tax income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
292.87%
Pre-tax margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
286.36%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
215.38%
Net income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
223.44%
Net margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
233.33%
EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
233.33%
Diluted EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.18%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.46%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.