205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.31%
Revenue growth below 50% of MCHP's 6.89%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
1.26%
Cost growth less than half of MCHP's 6.73%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
3.64%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MCHP's 7.04%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.30%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 0.15%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
10.68%
R&D growth above 1.5x MCHP's 4.64%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.42%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MCHP's 19.10%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.08%
Total costs growth less than half of MCHP's 11.21%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-122.86%
D&A reduction while MCHP shows 9.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-13.14%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.10%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.33%
Operating income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.84%
Operating margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
366.67%
Other expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
25.17%
Pre-tax income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.35%
Pre-tax margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
13.40%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
34.92%
Net income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
31.88%
Net margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.33%
Diluted EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-29.56%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-27.87%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 4.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.