PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.42%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
6.96%
Cost increase while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-0.96%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.54%
Margin decline while MCHP shows 1.93% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.11%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
188.89%
Other expenses change of 188.89% while MCHP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
5.35%
Operating expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.37%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-135.38%
D&A reduction while MCHP shows 0.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-27.25%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 1.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.94%
EBITDA margin decline while MCHP shows 5.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.38%
Operating income decline while MCHP shows 1.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.97%
Operating margin decline while MCHP shows 5.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
187.50%
Other expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.68%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 1.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.16%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 5.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.21%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x MCHP's 1.63%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
21.82%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 1.66%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
22.33%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 5.32%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
14.29%
EPS change of 14.29% while MCHP is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
15.00%
Diluted EPS change of 15.00% while MCHP is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
4.86%
Share count reduction below 50% of MCHP's 4.17%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
5.55%
Diluted share increase while MCHP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.