205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.34%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MCHP's 4.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
3.20%
Cost growth 1.1-1.25x MCHP's 2.80%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of cost control initiatives.
1.44%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MCHP's 6.29%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.88%
Margin decline while MCHP shows 1.67% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
18.99%
R&D growth above 1.5x MCHP's 6.38%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.44%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.73%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.39%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.49%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 129.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.73%
EBITDA margin decline while MCHP shows 119.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
9.27%
Operating income growth below 50% of MCHP's 856.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.78%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 814.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.92%
Other expenses growth less than half of MCHP's 141.11%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
12.03%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MCHP's 965.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.48%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 919.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
57.46%
Tax expense growth less than half of MCHP's 967.14%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-7.68%
Net income decline while MCHP shows 964.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.78%
Net margin decline while MCHP shows 918.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.85%
EPS decline while MCHP shows 990.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MCHP shows 930.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.29%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.04%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 4.24% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.