PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.98%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 0.14%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
8.19%
Cost increase while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-2.45%
Gross profit decline while MCHP shows 0.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.19%
Margin decline while MCHP shows 0.24% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.72%
R&D growth less than half of MCHP's 6.15%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.57%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MCHP's 2.34%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
6.58%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MCHP's 0.78%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.24%
D&A growth less than half of MCHP's 3.33%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-7.84%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 0.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.37%
EBITDA margin decline while MCHP shows 0.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.68%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.37%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
213.16%
Other expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.91%
Pre-tax income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.94%
Pre-tax margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-263.64%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
97.89%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 1.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
90.32%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 1.71%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
120.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 5.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
120.00%
Diluted EPS change of 120.00% while MCHP is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
-10.05%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.53% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-10.05%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 0.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.