205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.36%
Positive growth while MCHP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.86%
Cost increase while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
15.92%
Positive growth while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.00%
Margin expansion while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.27%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.20%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
2.10%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.36%
D&A growth above 1.5x MCHP's 1.28%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
31.38%
EBITDA growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.14%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 0.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
75.90%
Operating income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
60.85%
Operating margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-8.89%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 135.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
46.09%
Pre-tax income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
33.59%
Pre-tax margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
176.19%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.77%
Net income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.95%
Net margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-15.38%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-16.00%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
50.74%
Share count reduction below 50% of MCHP's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
51.98%
Diluted share increase while MCHP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.