205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.99%
Similar revenue growth to MCHP's 6.83%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
2.41%
Cost growth less than half of MCHP's 55.37%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
10.72%
Positive growth while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.46%
Margin expansion while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.27%
R&D growth while MCHP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.17%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MCHP's 3.23%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
5.57%
Total costs growth less than half of MCHP's 35.02%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.14%
D&A reduction while MCHP shows 108.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
1.45%
EBITDA growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-4.29%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.22%
Operating income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.10%
Operating margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-65.85%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-8.02%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
210.42%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-28.46%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.55%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.13%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-34.35%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 3.07% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.