PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.74%
Revenue decline while MCHP shows 11.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.06%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 7.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.15%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MCHP's 14.34%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.25%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 2.92%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.43%
R&D growth less than half of MCHP's 5.34%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.29%
Operating expenses reduction while MCHP shows 52.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-7.27%
Total costs reduction while MCHP shows 23.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.84%
D&A reduction while MCHP shows 3.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.90%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
5.14%
EBITDA margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.69%
Operating income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.94%
Operating margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-45.24%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 5.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.40%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.42%
Pre-tax margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
69.23%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.12%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.01%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.24%
EPS decline while MCHP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.29%
Diluted EPS decline while MCHP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.33%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.36%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 3.03% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.