205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.73%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MCHP's 3.34%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
2.18%
Similar cost growth to MCHP's 2.03%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
1.31%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MCHP's 4.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.41%
Margin decline while MCHP shows 0.87% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.34%
R&D growth while MCHP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.03%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MCHP's 0.76%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
3.17%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MCHP's 1.56%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.29%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.14%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 6.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.80%
EBITDA margin decline while MCHP shows 3.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.41%
Operating income decline while MCHP shows 6.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.07%
Operating margin decline while MCHP shows 3.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-37.21%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 19.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.29%
Pre-tax income decline while MCHP shows 7.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.91%
Pre-tax margin decline while MCHP shows 4.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.67%
Tax expense reduction while MCHP shows 155.39% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-70.59%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-71.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.48%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-69.33%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.03%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.67% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-3.09%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 0.46% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.