205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.45%
Revenue decline while MCHP shows 3.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-20.07%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 2.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-33.23%
Gross profit decline while MCHP shows 3.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-9.22%
Margin decline while MCHP shows 0.54% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-14.99%
R&D reduction while MCHP shows 3.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.72%
Operating expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.57%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.69%
D&A growth while MCHP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-61.53%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 66.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-47.69%
EBITDA margin decline while MCHP shows 61.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-93.30%
Operating income decline while MCHP shows 3.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.89%
Operating margin decline while MCHP shows 0.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-240.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-95.24%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-93.53%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-136.79%
Tax expense reduction while MCHP shows 9.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-80.99%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-74.16%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.07%
EPS decline while MCHP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-79.07%
Diluted EPS decline while MCHP shows 5.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.76%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-2.28%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.