205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.95%
Revenue growth below 50% of MCHP's 19.16%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.46%
Cost growth less than half of MCHP's 29.59%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
1.45%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MCHP's 12.82%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.49%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.47%
R&D growth less than half of MCHP's 13.10%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
550.00%
Other expenses change of 550.00% while MCHP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
3.41%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MCHP's 9.71%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.78%
Total costs growth less than half of MCHP's 21.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.16%
D&A reduction while MCHP shows 10.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-0.70%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 40.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.59%
EBITDA margin decline while MCHP shows 17.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.33%
Operating income decline while MCHP shows 15.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-60.00%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 67.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.98%
Pre-tax income decline while MCHP shows 17.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.95%
Tax expense reduction while MCHP shows 24.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.90%
Net income growth below 50% of MCHP's 15.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.79%
EPS growth below 50% of MCHP's 16.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.82%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MCHP's 12.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.94%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.41% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.17%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 0.33% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.