205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.33%
Revenue decline while MCHP shows 3.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
8.71%
Cost growth above 1.5x MCHP's 1.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-11.24%
Gross profit decline while MCHP shows 4.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-10.04%
Margin decline while MCHP shows 0.91% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
20.00%
R&D growth above 1.5x MCHP's 4.65%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.27%
Other expenses change of 80.27% while MCHP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
27.20%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x MCHP's 2.79%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
15.20%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MCHP's 2.29%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
40.00%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MCHP's 5.12%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
46.90%
D&A growth while MCHP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-31.34%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 3.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.42%
EBITDA margin decline while MCHP shows 0.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-55.16%
Operating income decline while MCHP shows 5.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.56%
Operating margin decline while MCHP shows 2.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
50.00%
Other expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-55.38%
Pre-tax income decline while MCHP shows 4.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.78%
Pre-tax margin decline while MCHP shows 1.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.07%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-50.42%
Net income decline while MCHP shows 24.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.75%
Net margin decline while MCHP shows 20.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-50.00%
EPS decline while MCHP shows 22.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.02%
Diluted EPS decline while MCHP shows 26.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.70%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.35%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.