205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.62%
Revenue growth 50-75% of MCHP's 8.85%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
-2.25%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 26.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
14.26%
Positive growth while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
8.19%
Margin expansion while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-7.16%
R&D reduction while MCHP shows 31.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-294.06%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-32.18%
Operating expenses reduction while MCHP shows 53.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-14.02%
Total costs reduction while MCHP shows 37.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.35%
Interest expense growth less than half of MCHP's 17.60%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-12.17%
D&A reduction while MCHP shows 10.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
70.42%
EBITDA growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
61.36%
EBITDA margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
129.37%
Operating income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
117.17%
Operating margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-14.29%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
135.83%
Pre-tax income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
123.29%
Pre-tax margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1750.00%
Tax expense growth above 1.5x MCHP's 91.73%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
82.32%
Net income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
72.63%
Net margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.37%
EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
81.25%
Diluted EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.36%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.53%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.