205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.35%
Positive growth while MCHP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
3.26%
Cost increase while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
8.67%
Positive growth while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.18%
Margin expansion while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-4.87%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.13%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 27.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.34%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.69%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.17%
Interest expense reduction while MCHP shows 1.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.33%
D&A growth while MCHP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.02%
EBITDA growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.15%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 1.65%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
19.65%
Operating income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.51%
Operating margin growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 1.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.76%
Other expenses growth less than half of MCHP's 31.29%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
20.19%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 1.24%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
13.01%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 3.40%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
18.35%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.94%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 5.61%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
13.72%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 7.86%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
22.22%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 8.00%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
22.58%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 4.35%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.03%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.47% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.10%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 1.21% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.