205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.64%
Revenue decline while MCHP shows 7.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.91%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 9.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.17%
Gross profit decline while MCHP shows 5.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.55%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.68%
Similar R&D growth to MCHP's 9.06%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.27%
Other expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.92%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MCHP's 16.01%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
1.06%
Total costs growth less than half of MCHP's 12.49%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.95%
D&A reduction while MCHP shows 71.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.03%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 19.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.67%
EBITDA margin decline while MCHP shows 11.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.91%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.46%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.52%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.26%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.40%
Tax expense growth less than half of MCHP's 153.86%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-20.48%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.48%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.74%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.21%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.28% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.19%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 0.83% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.