205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.00%
Revenue decline while MCHP shows 2.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-7.61%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 1.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.56%
Gross profit decline while MCHP shows 3.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.47%
Margin expansion below 50% of MCHP's 1.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.16%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-84.34%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.09%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-9.62%
Total costs reduction while MCHP shows 0.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.42%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-2.27%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 4.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.09%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 1.62%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-1.89%
Operating income decline while MCHP shows 12.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.49%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of MCHP's 9.58%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
81.25%
Other expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.68%
Pre-tax margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-13.43%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
4.76%
Net income growth below 50% of MCHP's 15.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
12.65%
Similar net margin growth to MCHP's 12.42%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
3.90%
EPS growth below 50% of MCHP's 13.64%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.26%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MCHP's 15.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.82%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.77%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.