205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.81%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 1.39%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
7.26%
Similar cost growth to MCHP's 6.89%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
9.81%
Positive growth while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.92%
Margin expansion while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.90%
R&D growth less than half of MCHP's 12.49%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.67%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MCHP's 17.84%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.83%
Total costs growth less than half of MCHP's 11.85%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-4.55%
Interest expense reduction while MCHP shows 6.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.02%
D&A reduction while MCHP shows 26.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
11.79%
EBITDA growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.74%
EBITDA margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.39%
Operating income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.05%
Operating margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
16.67%
Other expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.00%
Pre-tax income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.61%
Pre-tax margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
18.41%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.19%
Net income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.86%
Net margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.71%
EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.49%
Diluted EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.32%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 1.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.20%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 0.15% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.