PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN)
205.980.01 (0.00%)
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.35%
Revenue decline while MCHP shows 43.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-1.80%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 76.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
0.52%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MCHP's 15.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.87%
Margin expansion while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
7.58%
R&D growth less than half of MCHP's 54.63%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.00%
Other expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.58%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MCHP's 73.63%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
2.63%
Total costs growth less than half of MCHP's 75.39%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-5.26%
Interest expense reduction while MCHP shows 28.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
1.32%
D&A growth less than half of MCHP's 66.56%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-13.77%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.08%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-98.31%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-16.17%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-15.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.67%
Tax expense reduction while MCHP shows 289.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-4.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.44%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.81%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.90%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.20%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 5.12%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.10%
Diluted share increase while MCHP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.