205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.55%
Similar revenue growth to MCHP's 9.00%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
4.85%
Cost growth above 1.5x MCHP's 2.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
10.73%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MCHP's 17.83%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
2.00%
Margin expansion below 50% of MCHP's 8.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.44%
R&D growth while MCHP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.38%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.22%
Operating expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.93%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.11%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MCHP's 2.06%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-2.17%
D&A reduction while MCHP shows 0.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
15.17%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MCHP's 374.25%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.09%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 335.08%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
18.21%
Operating income growth below 50% of MCHP's 206.19%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.90%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 197.42%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
18.41%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MCHP's 127.81%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.08%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 125.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
66.67%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.92%
Net income growth below 50% of MCHP's 129.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.43%
Net margin decline while MCHP shows 127.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.06%
EPS growth below 50% of MCHP's 130.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.19%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MCHP's 126.92%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.40%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.63% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.39%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 9.15% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.