205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.45%
Positive growth while MCHP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
10.69%
Cost increase while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
11.88%
Similar gross profit growth to MCHP's 13.31%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
0.38%
Margin expansion below 50% of MCHP's 18.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.79%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.22%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 7.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-2.91%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.20%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.00%
Interest expense reduction while MCHP shows 0.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.45%
EBITDA growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.38%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 3.10%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
20.81%
Operating income growth below 50% of MCHP's 88.14%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.40%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 96.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-83.33%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 7.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
20.39%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MCHP's 230.89%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.02%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 245.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
17.21%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.69%
Net income growth below 50% of MCHP's 215.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.18%
Net margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 229.98%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.86%
EPS growth below 50% of MCHP's 212.50%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.33%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MCHP's 228.57%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.60%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.32% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.69%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 0.63% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.