205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-8.89%
Revenue decline while MCHP shows 8.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-10.27%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 0.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-8.13%
Gross profit decline while MCHP shows 14.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.83%
Margin expansion below 50% of MCHP's 5.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.93%
R&D growth while MCHP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.23%
Other expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.04%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of MCHP's 1.97%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-6.06%
Total costs reduction while MCHP shows 1.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.53%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of MCHP's 18.55%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
-0.44%
D&A reduction while MCHP shows 13.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-11.71%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.09%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-12.58%
Operating income decline while MCHP shows 30.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.05%
Operating margin decline while MCHP shows 20.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1400.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-13.36%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
139.29%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-73.23%
Net income decline while MCHP shows 27.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.62%
Net margin decline while MCHP shows 18.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-72.87%
EPS decline while MCHP shows 24.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-73.02%
Diluted EPS decline while MCHP shows 21.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.30%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 3.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.10%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 1.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.