205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.07%
Positive growth while MCHP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.22%
Cost increase while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
7.06%
Positive growth while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.93%
Margin expansion 1.25-1.5x MCHP's 0.64%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
1.56%
R&D growth while MCHP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.22%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.41%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
0.82%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.00%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MCHP's 0.58%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
4.29%
D&A growth while MCHP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.88%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 2.90%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
5.48%
EBITDA margin growth 1.25-1.5x MCHP's 4.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
13.14%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x MCHP's 8.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
6.66%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of MCHP's 10.77%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-116.67%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
12.78%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 5.59%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.32%
Similar pre-tax margin growth to MCHP's 7.50%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
17.61%
Tax expense growth less than half of MCHP's 15433.42%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
11.74%
Net income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.34%
Net margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.59%
EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.86%
Diluted EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.82%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.34% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.80%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.