205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.31%
Revenue decline while MCHP shows 20.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
1.76%
Cost growth less than half of MCHP's 47.34%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-6.07%
Gross profit decline while MCHP shows 4.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-2.85%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.75%
R&D reduction while MCHP shows 28.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.60%
Other expenses growth less than half of MCHP's 82.44%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-1.01%
Operating expenses reduction while MCHP shows 26.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.64%
Total costs growth less than half of MCHP's 37.22%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
5.56%
Interest expense growth less than half of MCHP's 79.70%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.61%
D&A growth less than half of MCHP's 40.72%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-6.43%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 14.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.04%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
84.62%
Other expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-8.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-39.39%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-1.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.59%
Net margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.79%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.47%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.44%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 0.28% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.