PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.06%
Revenue growth below 50% of MCHP's 18.14%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-1.88%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 30.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
4.38%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MCHP's 7.37%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
2.27%
Margin expansion while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.26%
R&D growth less than half of MCHP's 29.09%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.30%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 97.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.17%
Operating expenses reduction while MCHP shows 21.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.39%
Total costs reduction while MCHP shows 26.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
15.79%
Interest expense growth less than half of MCHP's 53.32%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.49%
D&A growth less than half of MCHP's 27.89%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
9.09%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of MCHP's 15.82%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
6.88%
EBITDA margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.21%
Operating income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.01%
Operating margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
500.00%
Other expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.95%
Pre-tax income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.73%
Pre-tax margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
30.63%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.23%
Net income growth below 50% of MCHP's 169.75%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.07%
Net margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 128.32%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.98%
EPS growth below 50% of MCHP's 180.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.94%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MCHP's 171.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.21%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.