205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.81%
Positive growth while MCHP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.30%
Cost increase while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
3.64%
Gross profit growth below 50% of MCHP's 13.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.81%
Margin expansion below 50% of MCHP's 17.86%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.82%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.55%
Other expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.35%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MCHP's 3.13%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
0.93%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.27%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
3.00%
D&A growth while MCHP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.00%
EBITDA growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
1.16%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 4.09%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.51%
Operating income growth below 50% of MCHP's 89.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.63%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 97.55%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-212.50%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 1.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.36%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MCHP's 239.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.51%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 245.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-25.84%
Tax expense reduction while MCHP shows 104.27% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.20%
Net income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.21%
Net margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.14%
EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.56%
Diluted EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.21%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.38% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.31%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.