205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.23%
Positive growth while MCHP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.34%
Cost increase while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
5.71%
Positive growth while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.46%
Margin expansion while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.52%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.00%
Operating expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
3.84%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.17%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.82%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.36%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MCHP's 4.43%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.62%
EBITDA margin decline while MCHP shows 5.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.95%
Operating income growth below 50% of MCHP's 35.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.64%
Operating margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 37.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.62%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of MCHP's 95.41%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.37%
Pre-tax margin decline while MCHP shows 97.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.18%
Tax expense reduction while MCHP shows 36.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
3.85%
Net income growth below 50% of MCHP's 23.72%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.31%
Net margin decline while MCHP shows 25.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.83%
EPS growth below 50% of MCHP's 19.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.89%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of MCHP's 20.00%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.33%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 3.17%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.32%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MCHP's 0.19%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.