205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.38%
Revenue growth below 50% of MCHP's 3.25%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.80%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 0.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.44%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MCHP's 4.69%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.05%
Similar margin change to MCHP's 1.39%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
-0.77%
R&D reduction while MCHP shows 5.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.08%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-1.97%
Operating expenses reduction while MCHP shows 3.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-1.23%
Total costs reduction while MCHP shows 2.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.27%
Interest expense growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.43%
D&A growth above 1.5x MCHP's 0.38%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
1.58%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MCHP's 3.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.20%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 0.70%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.16%
Operating income growth below 50% of MCHP's 8.58%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.74%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of MCHP's 5.16%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-203.45%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.47%
Pre-tax income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.10%
Pre-tax margin growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.47%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.83%
Net income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.96%
EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.98%
Diluted EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.11%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 2.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.