205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
6.26%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x MCHP's 5.12%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
8.48%
Cost growth above 1.5x MCHP's 3.51%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
5.32%
Similar gross profit growth to MCHP's 6.02%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-0.89%
Margin decline while MCHP shows 0.86% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.88%
R&D growth above 1.5x MCHP's 3.27%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.62%
Operating expenses growth 1.1-1.25x MCHP's 2.15%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
6.28%
Total costs growth above 1.5x MCHP's 2.79%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-5.77%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
12.15%
D&A growth above 1.5x MCHP's 1.95%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
6.38%
Similar EBITDA growth to MCHP's 8.06%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
0.11%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MCHP's 2.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.24%
Operating income growth below 50% of MCHP's 12.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.02%
Operating margin decline while MCHP shows 7.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.51%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
6.14%
Pre-tax income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.12%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
20.00%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.09%
Net income growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.20%
EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.81%
Diluted EPS growth while MCHP declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.33%
Share count reduction while MCHP shows 0.69% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.43%
Diluted share reduction while MCHP shows 0.14% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.