205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.23%
Revenue decline while MCHP shows 6.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.23%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 4.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.26%
Gross profit decline while MCHP shows 7.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.09%
Margin decline while MCHP shows 0.81% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.84%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x MCHP's 3.82%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.98%
Operating expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.96%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
13.33%
Interest expense growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.84%
D&A growth while MCHP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.83%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 10.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.71%
EBITDA margin decline while MCHP shows 3.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.12%
Operating income decline while MCHP shows 27.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.22%
Operating margin decline while MCHP shows 19.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
233.33%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x MCHP's 22.19%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-10.20%
Pre-tax income decline while MCHP shows 34.93% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.23%
Pre-tax margin decline while MCHP shows 26.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.10%
Tax expense growth less than half of MCHP's 237.53%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-12.95%
Net income decline while MCHP shows 15.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.16%
Net margin decline while MCHP shows 8.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.96%
EPS decline while MCHP shows 16.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.15%
Diluted EPS decline while MCHP shows 16.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.11%
Share count increase while MCHP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.