205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-10.20%
Revenue decline while MCHP shows 2.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.86%
Cost reduction while MCHP shows 2.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-13.82%
Gross profit decline while MCHP shows 2.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.03%
Margin decline while MCHP shows 0.07% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.91%
R&D growth above 1.5x MCHP's 0.07%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.91%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.64%
Total costs reduction while MCHP shows 0.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
18.37%
Interest expense growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.42%
D&A growth while MCHP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-10.69%
EBITDA decline while MCHP shows 3.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.54%
EBITDA margin decline while MCHP shows 0.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.11%
Operating income decline while MCHP shows 6.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.58%
Operating margin decline while MCHP shows 3.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.33%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-16.47%
Pre-tax income decline while MCHP shows 5.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.98%
Pre-tax margin decline while MCHP shows 3.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.21%
Tax expense growth while MCHP reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.40%
Net income decline while MCHP shows 10.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.24%
Net margin decline while MCHP shows 7.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.33%
EPS decline while MCHP shows 10.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-19.46%
Diluted EPS decline while MCHP shows 11.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.22%
Share count increase while MCHP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.22%
Diluted share increase while MCHP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.