205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.40%
Positive growth while MCHP shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.87%
Cost increase while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
5.54%
Positive growth while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.09%
Margin expansion while MCHP shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
4.18%
R&D growth while MCHP reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% while MCHP maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
19.04%
Operating expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.38%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.93%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x MCHP's 4.00%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
5.25%
D&A growth while MCHP reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.68%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.86%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.95%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.04%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-114.29%
Other expenses reduction while MCHP shows 6.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.56%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-36.17%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
1.99%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 0.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-2.31%
Net margin decline while MCHP shows 1.55% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.65%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x MCHP's 0.82%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.67%
Diluted EPS change of 1.67% while MCHP is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
0.22%
Share count increase while MCHP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.22%
Diluted share increase while MCHP reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.