205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.47%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
0.95%
Cost increase while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
-6.47%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.11%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.20%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.85%
Operating expenses growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.27%
Total costs growth while MCHP reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.76%
Interest expense reduction while MCHP shows 8.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
8.21%
D&A change of 8.21% while MCHP maintains D&A. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
-7.81%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.50%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.55%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.41%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-19.79%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-11.53%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-10.81%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-11.56%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.11%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.11%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.