205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-2.31%
Revenue decline while MPWR shows 4.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.95%
Cost reduction while MPWR shows 5.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.08%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of MPWR's 3.62%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
4.49%
Margin expansion while MPWR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-1.79%
R&D reduction while MPWR shows 4.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.56%
Operating expenses reduction while MPWR shows 9.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-5.72%
Total costs reduction while MPWR shows 6.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.24%
D&A growth while MPWR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
59.31%
EBITDA growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
63.07%
EBITDA margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
24.74%
Operating income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
27.68%
Operating margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-82.46%
Other expenses reduction while MPWR shows 138.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.98%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MPWR's 1.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.50%
Pre-tax margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.50%
Similar tax expense growth to MPWR's 7.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
587.55%
Net income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
603.78%
Net margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
558.82%
EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
568.75%
Diluted EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.89%
Share count reduction below 50% of MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.76%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.