PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.93%
Revenue decline while MPWR shows 4.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
2.50%
Cost growth less than half of MPWR's 5.01%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-29.32%
Gross profit decline while MPWR shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-21.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-55.74%
R&D reduction while MPWR shows 4.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-39.72%
Operating expenses reduction while MPWR shows 9.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.94%
Total costs reduction while MPWR shows 6.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.31%
D&A growth while MPWR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
70.19%
EBITDA growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
66.90%
EBITDA margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
89.00%
Operating income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
87.79%
Operating margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-11.36%
Other expenses reduction while MPWR shows 138.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
110.90%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MPWR's 1.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
112.10%
Pre-tax margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-94.39%
Tax expense reduction while MPWR shows 7.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
103.86%
Net income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
104.28%
Net margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.56%
EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
105.56%
Diluted EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.07%
Share count reduction below 50% of MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.33%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.