205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-0.42%
Revenue decline while MPWR shows 4.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
6.96%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 5.01%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
-0.96%
Gross profit decline while MPWR shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.54%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.11%
R&D reduction while MPWR shows 4.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
188.89%
Other expenses change of 188.89% while MPWR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
5.35%
Operating expenses growth 50-75% of MPWR's 9.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
6.37%
Similar total costs growth to MPWR's 6.62%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-135.38%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-27.25%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.94%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.38%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
187.50%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x MPWR's 138.16%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
14.68%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MPWR's 1.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
15.16%
Pre-tax margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.21%
Similar tax expense growth to MPWR's 7.86%. Walter Schloss would investigate patterns.
21.82%
Net income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
22.33%
Net margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
14.29%
EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.00%
Diluted EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.86%
Share count reduction below 50% of MPWR's 0.04%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
5.55%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MPWR's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.