205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-9.23%
Revenue decline while MPWR shows 4.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.50%
Cost reduction while MPWR shows 5.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-17.32%
Gross profit decline while MPWR shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.91%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.11%
R&D reduction while MPWR shows 4.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.49%
Operating expenses reduction while MPWR shows 9.10% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-10.32%
Total costs reduction while MPWR shows 6.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.62%
D&A growth while MPWR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
53.06%
EBITDA growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
68.62%
EBITDA margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.79%
Operating income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.43%
Operating margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-47.62%
Other expenses reduction while MPWR shows 138.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
12.89%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x MPWR's 1.78%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
4.03%
Pre-tax margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-79.66%
Tax expense reduction while MPWR shows 7.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
40.61%
Net income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
34.57%
Net margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.36%
EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-6.67%
Share count reduction while MPWR shows 0.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-6.67%
Diluted share reduction while MPWR shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.