205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-3.35%
Revenue decline while MPWR shows 4.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-3.65%
Cost reduction while MPWR shows 5.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.35%
Gross profit decline while MPWR shows 3.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.03%
Margin expansion while MPWR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
6.70%
R&D growth above 1.5x MPWR's 4.38%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.94%
Operating expenses growth less than half of MPWR's 9.10%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-1.86%
Total costs reduction while MPWR shows 6.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.51%
D&A growth while MPWR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.56%
EBITDA growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.29%
EBITDA margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-9.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-13.18%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while MPWR shows 138.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.18%
Pre-tax income decline while MPWR shows 1.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.35%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-43.40%
Tax expense reduction while MPWR shows 7.86% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
0.85%
Net income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-2.59%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.57%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.57%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-4.27%
Share count reduction while MPWR shows 0.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-4.27%
Diluted share reduction while MPWR shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.