205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.54%
Revenue decline while MPWR shows 25.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-2.55%
Cost reduction while MPWR shows 11.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-7.90%
Gross profit decline while MPWR shows 44.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-3.53%
Margin decline while MPWR shows 14.58% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.72%
R&D reduction while MPWR shows 36.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.31%
Operating expenses reduction while MPWR shows 421.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-2.81%
Total costs reduction while MPWR shows 160.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.19%
D&A growth while MPWR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-6.99%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.57%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-38.53%
Operating income decline while MPWR shows 31.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-35.61%
Operating margin decline while MPWR shows 45.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1574.42%
Other expenses reduction while MPWR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-473.03%
Pre-tax income decline while MPWR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-490.76%
Pre-tax margin decline while MPWR shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
161.11%
Tax expense growth while MPWR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-413.30%
Net income decline while MPWR shows 39.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-428.19%
Net margin decline while MPWR shows 52.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-427.27%
EPS decline while MPWR shows 41.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-427.27%
Diluted EPS decline while MPWR shows 42.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.63%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-4.63%
Diluted share reduction while MPWR shows 1.91% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.