205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.54M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.14%
Positive growth while MPWR shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-3.41%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
12.09%
Positive growth while MPWR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.74%
Margin expansion while MPWR shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.97%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
1.00%
Operating expenses growth while MPWR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-1.92%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.00%
D&A reduction while MPWR shows 170.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
7.11%
EBITDA growth below 50% of MPWR's 103.04%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.87%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of MPWR's 103.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
128.36%
Operating income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
123.57%
Operating margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
100.16%
Other expenses change of 100.16% while MPWR maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
127.16%
Income change of 127.16% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
126.59%
Margin change of 126.59% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
68.18%
Tax expense growth while MPWR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
119.86%
Net income growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
119.45%
Net margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
119.44%
EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
119.44%
Diluted EPS growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2.54%
Share count reduction below 50% of MPWR's 4.91%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
2.54%
Diluted share change of 2.54% while MPWR is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.