205.24 - 207.41
139.95 - 221.69
4.54M / 6.59M (Avg.)
37.59 | 5.48
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.36%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x MPWR's 0.65%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
4.86%
Cost increase while MPWR reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
15.92%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x MPWR's 8.93%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
6.00%
Margin expansion 50-75% of MPWR's 8.22%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
-4.27%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.20%
Operating expenses reduction while MPWR shows 800.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
2.10%
Total costs growth less than half of MPWR's 216.06%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.36%
D&A growth while MPWR reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
31.38%
EBITDA growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
20.14%
EBITDA margin growth while MPWR declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
75.90%
Similar operating income growth to MPWR's 94.35%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
60.85%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of MPWR's 93.09%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-8.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
46.09%
Income change of 46.09% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
33.59%
Margin change of 33.59% while MPWR is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
176.19%
Tax expense growth while MPWR reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
14.77%
Net income growth below 50% of MPWR's 114.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.95%
Net margin growth below 50% of MPWR's 113.10%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-15.38%
EPS decline while MPWR shows 107.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.00%
Diluted EPS decline while MPWR shows 103.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
50.74%
Share count reduction below 50% of MPWR's 3.40%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
51.98%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of MPWR's 5.45%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.